Theory of Education and Uliyana

52 min
Czech Republic
Right to human dignity Philosophy of Human Rights Children's rights

eng: for_whom

Teachers Students Pupils Activists / NGOs Journalists Lawyers

Theory of Education and Uliyana

All pedagogic rules are helpless against this unique 9-year-old personality. Good children work hard and pray, they play together. Bad Uliyana doesn’t pray, she is usually alone. Her mother is a drug addict and her grandmother is an alcoholic. So the sisters from the New Holy Martyrs community, where Uliyana is institutionalized, consider her genetically defective. Even Mother Veniyamina, a former professional teacher and now a Christian orphan instructor, can’t cope with her.

All pedagogic rules are helpless against this unique 9-year-old personality. Good children work hard and pray, they play together. Bad Uliyana doesn’t pray, she is usually alone. Her mother is a drug addict and her grandmother is an alcoholic. So the sisters from the New Holy Martyrs community, where Uliyana is institutionalized, consider her genetically defective. Even Mother Veniyamina, a former professional teacher and now a Christian orphan instructor, can’t cope with her.

Director

Alexandr Gorelik

Alexandr Gorelik is a producer and director born in 1980 in Blagoveschensk, Russia. At 22 he moved to Saint Petersburg where he studied at the State University of Film and Television (directors’ workshop of Dmitry Sidorov).

Alexandr Gorelik is a producer and director born in 1980 in Blagoveschensk, Russia. At 22 he moved to Saint Petersburg where he studied at the State University of Film and Television (directors’ workshop of Dmitry Sidorov).

Film poster
Films shorts
Films shorts
Films shorts
Films shorts

First the film made me tense and then sad. The conditions in which the children grow up raise a lot of questions. The treatment of the children is cruel, prejudiced, their rights are violated, such as their right to leisure, right to health care and free professional medical help, to safe conditions for life and healthy development, to the standard of living sufficient for physical, intellectual, moral, cultural, spiritual and social development, the right to express their own opinion freely, to make up their own views, to develop their own social activity, their right to the freedom of conscience and religions beliefs. They abuse the exploitation of children’s labor. In general, it felt like time had stopped and the film was shot not in the 21st century but before 1861. The children are brought up obedient, thoughtless and capable of holding and using weapons. The question emerges, What for? Cruelty produced cruelty. Won’t they use the experience they gain in independent democratic states or in their families in the future? So the film raises a relevant problem. We had a lively discussion of the plot, and I’m glad to note that we were on the same wave. I’m looking forward to the next meeting!

 

 

Angelina,
visitor of the Docudays UA Human Rights film club